<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>

<rss version="2.0" 
   xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
   xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
   xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
   xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
   xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
   xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
   >
<channel>
    <title>Apples &amp; Oranges - User Comparisons</title>
    <link>http://apples.carsonwilson.com/</link>
    <description>How Digital &amp; Film Cameras Differ and Why it Matters to You, edited by Carson Wilson</description>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <generator>Serendipity 1.0.1 - http://www.s9y.org/</generator>
    <pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 16:06:12 GMT</pubDate>

    

<item>
    <title>Open Mike Night #28 - The Coming Change</title>
    <link>http://apples.carsonwilson.com/index.php?/archives/41-Open-Mike-Night-28-The-Coming-Change.html</link>
            <category>Quit Digital for Film</category>
    
    <comments>http://apples.carsonwilson.com/index.php?/archives/41-Open-Mike-Night-28-The-Coming-Change.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://apples.carsonwilson.com/wfwcomment.php?cid=41</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://apples.carsonwilson.com/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=41</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Carson Wilson)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    &lt;img width=&quot;110&quot; height=&quot;86&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; hspace=&quot;5&quot; align=&quot;left&quot; src=&quot;http://apples.carsonwilson.com/uploads/F1.serendipityThumb.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot;  /&gt;Professional photographer Michael Escalera recounts his journey from film to digital and back to film again in his recent article, &lt;a href=&quot;http://escaleraphotography.squarespace.com/journal/2009/6/26/open-mike-night-28-the-coming-change.html&quot;  title=&quot;Mike&#039;s blog&quot;&gt;The Coming Change&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;I have been photographing weddings for 11 years and love what I do for a living.  When I first began, I used film....In 2005 I transitioned to a digital workflow....In my experience, &lt;b&gt;the digital images were not as rich as the film images&lt;/b&gt;.  Sure, they were sharper and in some cases more vibrant, but they didn&#039;t fully match what I had hoped they would be.&lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://apples.carsonwilson.com/index.php?/archives/41-Open-Mike-Night-28-The-Coming-Change.html#extended&quot;&gt;Continue reading &quot;Open Mike Night #28 - The Coming Change&quot;&lt;/a&gt;
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 11:09:01 -0500</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://apples.carsonwilson.com/index.php?/archives/41-guid.html</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>Kirk Tuck's Return to Film</title>
    <link>http://apples.carsonwilson.com/index.php?/archives/38-Kirk-Tucks-Return-to-Film.html</link>
            <category>Quit Digital for Film</category>
    
    <comments>http://apples.carsonwilson.com/index.php?/archives/38-Kirk-Tucks-Return-to-Film.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://apples.carsonwilson.com/wfwcomment.php?cid=38</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://apples.carsonwilson.com/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=38</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Carson Wilson)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    &lt;div class=&quot;serendipity_imageComment_left&quot; style=&quot;width: 110px&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;serendipity_imageComment_img&quot;&gt;&lt;a class=&#039;serendipity_image_link&#039; href=&#039;http://www.kirktuck.com/About_Me.html&#039;&gt;&lt;img width=&quot;110&quot; height=&quot;73&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; hspace=&quot;5&quot; align=&quot;left&quot; src=&quot;http://apples.carsonwilson.com/uploads/kirk20for20web_1.serendipityThumb.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot;  /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;serendipity_imageComment_txt&quot;&gt;Kirk Tuck&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;In June 2001, professional photographer &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kirktuck.com/About_Me.html&quot;  title=&quot;Kirk&#039;s about me page&quot;&gt;Kirk Tuck&lt;/a&gt; achieved some small notoriety and elicited dozens of reader responses when he published his very compelling &lt;a href=&quot;http://photo.net/equipment/leica/m6&quot;  title=&quot;Leica M6 Review&quot;&gt;A Pro Photographer&#039;s review of the Leica M6 and lenses for it&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;Everyone seems to have an opinion about the Leica M series rangefinder cameras, yet so few people have actually picked one up and used it for enough time to understand the unique features and benefits that make it &lt;b&gt;one of the finest tools for certain kinds of photography&lt;/b&gt;.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Then on September 01, 2002, Kirk abruptly &quot;went digital:&quot; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://apples.carsonwilson.com/index.php?/archives/38-Kirk-Tucks-Return-to-Film.html#extended&quot;&gt;Continue reading &quot;Kirk Tuck&#039;s Return to Film&quot;&lt;/a&gt;
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 08:23:16 -0500</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://apples.carsonwilson.com/index.php?/archives/38-guid.html</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>My Year With Digital Cameras</title>
    <link>http://apples.carsonwilson.com/index.php?/archives/33-My-Year-With-Digital-Cameras.html</link>
            <category>Quit Digital for Film</category>
    
    <comments>http://apples.carsonwilson.com/index.php?/archives/33-My-Year-With-Digital-Cameras.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://apples.carsonwilson.com/wfwcomment.php?cid=33</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://apples.carsonwilson.com/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=33</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Carson Wilson)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    &lt;a href=&quot;http://apples.carsonwilson.com/index.php?/archives/33-My-Year-With-Digital-Cameras.html#extended&quot;  title=&quot;My year with digital&quot;&gt;&lt;img width=&quot;110&quot; height=&quot;72&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; hspace=&quot;5&quot; align=&quot;left&quot; src=&quot;http://apples.carsonwilson.com/uploads/schurzparktrees.serendipityThumb.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot;  /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;Commercial photographer &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.davebeckerman.com/general/darkroom-digital.html&quot;  title=&quot;Original article&quot;&gt;David Beckerman&lt;/a&gt; recounts the experiences that led him away from film and then finally back to it:&lt;blockquote&gt;It began on July 4th, 2004. I was by the East River photographing fireworks with my Elan 3, and nearby was a fellow with a big Canon digital SLR that he had just bought for $4500.   Sure it was a lot of money he said, but it paid for itself with a couple of photography assignment[s].&lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://apples.carsonwilson.com/index.php?/archives/33-My-Year-With-Digital-Cameras.html#extended&quot;&gt;Continue reading &quot;My Year With Digital Cameras&quot;&lt;/a&gt;
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 01:57:00 -0600</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://apples.carsonwilson.com/index.php?/archives/33-guid.html</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>The Writing on the Wall, Part One</title>
    <link>http://apples.carsonwilson.com/index.php?/archives/28-The-Writing-on-the-Wall,-Part-One.html</link>
            <category>User Comparisons</category>
    
    <comments>http://apples.carsonwilson.com/index.php?/archives/28-The-Writing-on-the-Wall,-Part-One.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://apples.carsonwilson.com/wfwcomment.php?cid=28</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://apples.carsonwilson.com/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=28</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Carson Wilson)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    &lt;a href=&quot;http://apples.carsonwilson.com/index.php?/archives/28-The-Writing-on-the-Wall,-Part-One.html&quot; &gt;&lt;img width=&quot;110&quot; height=&quot;85&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; hspace=&quot;5&quot; align=&quot;left&quot; src=&quot;http://apples.carsonwilson.com/apples/uploads/digital_writing3.serendipityThumb.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot;  /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;Last August, Bob Atkins published an article entitled &lt;b&gt;The Writing on the Wall&lt;/b&gt; on photo.net.  The article was rather inflammatory and generated numerous Reader&#039;s Comments, many of which were informative, insightful, and even humorous.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Unfortunately, when an article goes off photo.net&#039;s front page all reader comments are currently being dropped (see &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.photo.net/oped/bobatkins/digital.html&quot;  title=&quot;Current copy on photo.net&quot;&gt;the current copy of Bob&#039;s article&lt;/a&gt;).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fortunately, the wonders of html caching have preserved the entire article intact with reader comments.  I&#039;ve republished it below, unchanged except for minor formatting corrections.  Read on for more.. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://apples.carsonwilson.com/index.php?/archives/28-The-Writing-on-the-Wall,-Part-One.html#extended&quot;&gt;Continue reading &quot;The Writing on the Wall, Part One&quot;&lt;/a&gt;
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 13:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://apples.carsonwilson.com/index.php?/archives/28-guid.html</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>The Writing on the Wall, Part Two</title>
    <link>http://apples.carsonwilson.com/index.php?/archives/29-The-Writing-on-the-Wall,-Part-Two.html</link>
            <category>User Comparisons</category>
    
    <comments>http://apples.carsonwilson.com/index.php?/archives/29-The-Writing-on-the-Wall,-Part-Two.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://apples.carsonwilson.com/wfwcomment.php?cid=29</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://apples.carsonwilson.com/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=29</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Carson Wilson)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    &lt;A HREF=&quot;http://apples.carsonwilson.com/index.php?/archives/29-The-Writing-on-the-Wall,-Part-Two.html&quot;&gt;&lt;img width=&quot;110&quot; height=&quot;85&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; hspace=&quot;5&quot; align=&quot;left&quot; src=&quot;http://apples.carsonwilson.com/apples/uploads/digital_writing3.serendipityThumb.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot;  /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;This is a continuation of &lt;a href=&quot;http://carsonwilson.com/apples/index.php?/archives/28-The-Writing-on-the-Wall.html&quot;  title=&quot;Click here to go to part one.&quot;&gt;Part One&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://apples.carsonwilson.com/index.php?/archives/29-The-Writing-on-the-Wall,-Part-Two.html#extended&quot;&gt;Continue reading &quot;The Writing on the Wall, Part Two&quot;&lt;/a&gt;
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 12:59:00 -0500</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://apples.carsonwilson.com/index.php?/archives/29-guid.html</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>What to think of pocket digicams</title>
    <link>http://apples.carsonwilson.com/index.php?/archives/19-What-to-think-of-pocket-digicams.html</link>
            <category>User Comparisons</category>
    
    <comments>http://apples.carsonwilson.com/index.php?/archives/19-What-to-think-of-pocket-digicams.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://apples.carsonwilson.com/wfwcomment.php?cid=19</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://apples.carsonwilson.com/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=19</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Carson Wilson)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    Brief observation by author &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.majid.info/mylos/weblog/categories/photo/index.html&quot;&gt;Fazal Majid&lt;/a&gt; :&lt;blockquote&gt;Once you have used a digital SLR (DSLR) with a nice, clean, large, low-noise sensor, the poor image quality of most compact digicams becomes hard to tolerate. This is in contrast with film, where a $70 Olympus Stylus Epic can compete in image quality with thousand-dollar cameras.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Then it hit me: don&#039;t consider a pocket digicam as a camera, think of it as a pocket photocopier/scanner instead, like HP&#039;s ill-fated CapShare. I use my pocket digicam mostly to record specials in stores, flyers, magazine articles, diagrams on a whiteboard and the like. Japanese otaku teenagers are way ahead of me, as many bookstores in Tokyo now ban cameraphones because the kids would just snap photos of manga comic books and not pay.&lt;/blockquote&gt; 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2005 15:56:05 -0600</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://apples.carsonwilson.com/index.php?/archives/19-guid.html</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>Regressing: Why I Went Back to Film</title>
    <link>http://apples.carsonwilson.com/index.php?/archives/15-Regressing-Why-I-Went-Back-to-Film.html</link>
            <category>Quit Digital for Film</category>
    
    <comments>http://apples.carsonwilson.com/index.php?/archives/15-Regressing-Why-I-Went-Back-to-Film.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://apples.carsonwilson.com/wfwcomment.php?cid=15</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://apples.carsonwilson.com/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=15</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Carson Wilson)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    &lt;img width=&quot;200&quot; height=&quot;129&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; hspace=&quot;5&quot; align=&quot;right&quot; src=&quot;http://apples.carsonwilson.com/apples/uploads/100504_1.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot;  /&gt;Ian Kennedy jumped in to the digital revolution with both feet, one of the first to purchase an expensive Nikon D100 digital SLR.  Now he has traded it for &quot;an all-manual 35mm rangefinder with a 50mm prime lens.&quot;  In this web page he explains why:&lt;blockquote&gt;After a year and thousands of pictures, I decided that a DSLR, with all of its wonders, had an insidiously negative impact on the way I take photos. Because I was no longer worried about the amount of film that I was using, I frequently took three or more shots of the same subject and, to my shame, occasionally &quot;chimped&quot; those images as I took them.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;Now, don&#039;t misunderstand me, digital photography is great for commercial work. I shot four weddings and a couple of piecemeal freelance gigs with the D100, and, honestly, if I was to shoot another wedding, especially one for just any client, I would want to do it digitally. Shooting digitally frees the photographer from the concern that the shot has been missed. But, with that said, it also discounts the thought and craft, even the happy accidents of photography. I realized I had been relying on digital for what it too easily becomes: a crutch.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Read the rest of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.samys.com/articles/ian_kennedy/100504.php&quot;&gt;Regressing: Why I Went Back to Film&lt;/a&gt;. 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2005 12:40:42 -0500</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://apples.carsonwilson.com/index.php?/archives/15-guid.html</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>With a reasonable scanner, you can make 16mega pixel digital photo from high quality (or any quality) film camera.</title>
    <link>http://apples.carsonwilson.com/index.php?/archives/6-With-a-reasonable-scanner,-you-can-make-16mega-pixel-digital-photo-from-high-quality-or-any-quality-film-camera..html</link>
            <category>User Comparisons</category>
    
    <comments>http://apples.carsonwilson.com/index.php?/archives/6-With-a-reasonable-scanner,-you-can-make-16mega-pixel-digital-photo-from-high-quality-or-any-quality-film-camera..html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://apples.carsonwilson.com/wfwcomment.php?cid=6</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://apples.carsonwilson.com/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=6</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Carson Wilson)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    In his review of the Leica CM at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.photographyreview.com/cat/cameras/film-cameras/point-and-shoot/Leica/PRD_302597_3108crx.aspx&quot;&gt;PhotographyReview.com&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://forums.photographyreview.com/member.php?u=239923&quot;&gt;syuji&lt;/a&gt; writes,&lt;blockquote&gt;Just when I thought about going totally digital, I realized that with a reasonable scanner, you can make 16mega pixel digital photo from high quality (or any quality) film camera.&lt;/blockquote&gt; 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2005 17:13:31 -0500</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://apples.carsonwilson.com/index.php?/archives/6-guid.html</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>Wife's Leica Mini pics sharper, more detailed than digital camera shots</title>
    <link>http://apples.carsonwilson.com/index.php?/archives/4-Wifes-Leica-Mini-pics-sharper,-more-detailed-than-digital-camera-shots.html</link>
            <category>Quit Digital for Film</category>
    
    <comments>http://apples.carsonwilson.com/index.php?/archives/4-Wifes-Leica-Mini-pics-sharper,-more-detailed-than-digital-camera-shots.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://apples.carsonwilson.com/wfwcomment.php?cid=4</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://apples.carsonwilson.com/rss.php?version=2.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=4</wfw:commentRss>
    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Carson Wilson)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    At &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.photographyreview.com/cat/cameras/film-cameras/point-and-shoot/Leica/PRD_302597_3108crx.aspx&quot;&gt;PhotographyReview.com&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://forums.photographyreview.com/member.php?u=242659&quot;&gt;jpg&lt;/a&gt; writes in his review of the Leica CM dated June 13, 2005,&lt;blockquote&gt;I came upon the CM in a round about way. Previously I owned a Contax T2, which, unfortunately I traded for the new rage, a digital camera. After returning from a vacation trip, my wife and I compared photographs. We both noticed that that &lt;b&gt;her little Leica Mini pics were much sharper and detailed then my digital camera shots.&lt;/b&gt; So I began wishing I hadn&#039;t sold my Contax T2 and Contax is out of production so the T2 was no longer available and the last T3 at the dealers was sold.&lt;/blockquote&gt; 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2005 16:51:31 -0500</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://apples.carsonwilson.com/index.php?/archives/4-guid.html</guid>
    
</item>

</channel>
</rss>